Making Kids Look Taller So They Reach Ride Height Requirements – Yea Or Nay?

by SharonKurheg

If you have kids, or if you’ve been a kid and have gone to a Disney park (or any theme park, to be honest), you know the anguish of not being tall enough to go on the “big kid” rides. However regardless of the tears, 39.5″ won’t hack a 40″ minimum height requirement, because even if the kid has spiked hair, or stands on their toes, or hacked shoes like these…


Source: Facebook // Author unknown (for his/her own good)

…the rider operator knows all the tricks and knows the kid can’t ride because of the safety risk.

But what IS the safety risk? Obviously, if a kid is 40″ tall, one who is 39.5″ tall should be “good enough,” right? Well, it’s complicated.

How ride manufacturers determine minimum height restrictions is its own proprietary science (well, probably more like physics and maybe a little knowledge of human nature) that’s based on physical size, maturity level and marketability. However there seem to be two things in mind when considering height restrictions: for when things are going right and the ride is running as it should, and when things go wrong.

When things are going right & the ride is running as it should

This one is easy –  there are some rides where a too-short person (I’m even talking adults of very short stature) just won’t “fit” into the ride seat in the way the ride manufacturer intended. Someone under the height limit can have as much spikey hair and shoe lifts as (s)he wants, but neither will affect their trunk length, which is what’s needed for most safety instruments to work as intended.

  • Padded harnesses may leave too much space between the harness and a too-short person, which could allow them to wiggle around too much.
  • Lap bars that are used for 2 people might not adequately hold the smaller person, and depending on the ride, could allow the person to (literally) go flying – click here to see/read what happened when Chris Hemsworth tried to beat the system on what was then known as Twilight Zone Tower of Terror.

Manufacturers and ride operators also take a child’s age and ability to follow directions into consideration

  • On a ride like Soarin’, a younger child who would typically be under the 40″ height restriction might not be mature enough to follow the directions to stay seated…while being lifted 40′ into the air, placing him/her at risk for a huge fall.
  • On a ride like Silly Symphony Swings at Disneyland (or any “go in a circle on a swing” ride at a theme park or carnival), you’ve got the same immature person going high in the air and this time without an adult to hold onto him/her

Although not necessarily having to do with children per se, a person’s physical abilities and/or size also come into play.

  • A shorter person might not be able to reach the pedal on driving or a bumper car style ride like Autotopia, so (s)he wouldn’t be able to operate it alone (I am a whopping 1/4″ inch taller than the height restriction to drive Autotopia [and some bumper cars] and I BARELY toe that gas pedal).
  • A person who is an amputee might not be able to “hold on” as intended, placing him/her at risk for injury or even falling out of the ride vehicle during normal operation.
  • The girth of someone with a larger body size might not allow the ride’s safety mechanisms to lock into place appropriately.

When things go wrong

The problems can also happen when something goes wrong. I would explain the whole thing, but a Disney cast member already did. Read this.

There’s little written about the science behind height restrictions. The ride manufacturers make their recommendations known to the ride owner/operator and it’s up to them to follow through. In Disney’s case, with such a strong focus on safety (and to not be sued), they do their best to ensure their guests follow the height restrictions, even if it makes the child cry (cast members will sometimes give the child a “Go To The Head Of The Line” certificate for a future visit, providing (s)he is tall enough).

Want to comment on this post? Great! Read this first to help ensure it gets approved.
Want to sponsor a post, write something for Your Mileage May Vary or put ads on our site? Click here for more info.

Like this post? Please share it! We have plenty more just like it and would love it if you decided to hang around and sign up to get emailed notifications of when we post.

Whether you’ve read our articles before or this is the first time you’re stopping by, we’re really glad you’re here and hope you come back to visit again!

This post first appeared on Your Mileage May Vary


Christian February 17, 2024 - 11:47 pm

I have no opinion. Hell has frozen over.

Joe Maune February 18, 2024 - 2:09 am

Simply said, if you are reckless enough to put your child’s life just for a simple ride and it goes wrong, your child is dead and you won’t get enough money as well.

Parent February 18, 2024 - 9:20 am

Parents who actually love their children don’t put their lives at risk by navigating around safety restrictions

StAugustine February 18, 2024 - 10:35 am

When our family went to Disney in 2022 my younger granddaughter was just a little short to go on many of the what she called “fast rides.” Rather than trying to sneak her in we decided to go back in a couple of years, which we are doing this year.

Dave February 18, 2024 - 1:31 pm

Nay of course. Because the minute that one of these kids gets hurt or worse their uncaring neglectful parent is going to want to sue. And here’s hoping that they lose.

Cookie February 19, 2024 - 7:44 am

Absolutely NAY! If there is a height restriction, it’s there for a reason. These people will be the first to sue if something happens to injure their child.

Samus Aran February 19, 2024 - 10:52 am

These parents deserve to be trespassed and put behind bars for child endangerment.


Leave a Comment